Wise Recommendations on Literature Review of a Dissertation
You should approach the writing of a dissertation literature review with all responsibility. The main reason for that is the purpose of this piece of writing, which differs according to your academic surroundings. If your readers are less competent in your topic, the main purpose of reviewing literature base is instruction; if the readers are more competent than you, then with a review you show how well you know your subject and how much experience you have in researching it.
Algorithm of Composing Literature Review of a Dissertation
A literature review should be written before methodology and results sections of the work. In order to create a good literature review, you need to:
- Place the dissertation in line with other examples of relatable literature.
- Distinguish the key characteristics of the topic described in the work.
- Explain the connection (if any) between the existing works of the subject.
- Determine conflicts of sense in the work according to other works.
- Write about the contribution of the paper to the literature on the topic.
- Explain any further research that can be conducted on your topic.
The Contents of the Literature Review
The ideas to be included may sound complicated and confusing, but you have to try to describe them as structured and clear as possible, going from one subtopic to another. The review also has to be unbiased and well-readable, so mind the way you use terminology. The contents of the review should include:
- Overview of the topic you are researching.
- Division of the scholars’ works base into different categories (like those supporting a certain theory and those against it).
- The connection of your work to the papers written before.
- Conclusions about the papers you find the most significant for the subject development.
Works to Be Included into the Review
Make sure you choose the works thoroughly, as not all of them are written professionally enough to make a contribution. When choosing works to present, follow these guidelines:
- Author’s credentials.
What is the authority of the scholar that makes you think his or her work is worth including intro the knowledge base?
Is the author neutral enough in his or her work or the judgments are somehow biased?
Do the author’s conclusions contribute to the development of your research?
Choose all the literature wisely, reading something about the author before describing the work. Also, make sure you use transitions when flowing from one subtopic to another.